I am a sponsor and I think that we are innocent until proven guilty. I think, therefore, that if a man elected by the sovereign people (tsè! Sovereign ...) is investigated or prosecuted should not be forced to resign from his office, otherwise anyone could make policy with strokes of complaints and denunciations. But I also think that a representative of the people have a duty of moral and should, therefore, if someone raises a number of accusations against it, to erase any suspicion blows of truth. Only and only truth. Let the fact I happen to be one of the richest men in Europe and I am also the Italian Prime Minister, what happens to a young girl / escort / tissue that goes on Rai Due to slander? And what will happen a quei giudici che imbastiranno un processo su prove inconsistenti e su testimoni inattendibili? Vedranno il loro processo crollare come un castello di carte di fronte alla verità, perchè io sono innocente, nonché ricco. Le persone che hanno osato testimoniare il falso contro di me saranno processate per falso in atti giudiziari e io le querelerò per calunnia e diffamazione. Ecco cosa succederebbe se io fossi Berlusconi e se io fossi il Primo Ministro italiano.
Ma la realtà è diversa. Non c'è nessuna intenzione da parte dell'imputato di ristabilire un po' di verità (forse perché sarebbe una verità senza la condizionale?). L'imputato risponde alle accuse cercando di screditare i giudici, cercando di infilare a betrayal praise (the plural of award) and legitimate "anything" here and there, delaying until the prescription, defamed the judiciary. You do not hear anyone say the center-right Berlusconi is innocent and will prove it to the Supreme Court "but only that the charges are moved by communist judges.
not to speak to journalists. Those on the right throw mud on judging them unreliable witnesses, analyze and conclude that the interception can not be taken clips from the phone call or an exaggeration. Those left are convinced that Berlusconi is a pimp, who witnesses say all the truth and that a trial would end in a conviction. But the point is that both the right that the left and Berlusconi have tried each of the parties deemed it as best suits them. Immaculate to the right, bitch and extortioner for the left.
And then pages and pages of services, hours and hours of broadcasts with columnists, commentators, journalists and cartoonists. And running money, advertising prices that skyrocket and Annozero, the Ballarò the door to door and Matrix that plays for gloating. Come out dozens of books on the subject, Labor has already written one (Papi, I think) and I do not think that will be the only one. Cyrano
money, for them, but we only run the ball. In a civilized country with a scandal like the Premier would run to show the judges their declaimed innocence and, perhaps, for the sake of the country and the people, resigned to face the law like a common citizen and not from a position of power as that of billionaire Prime Minister in a parliamentary republic. In a normal country if you do not show your process you are to pick up men in uniform and in the process you go there, period. In a decent country journalists are merely reporting the news and not making processes and appeared to be superstars in any talk show. In a decent country there would be no opposition, and D'Alema "the banker failed" hemicycle left. In a civilized country would be left of the leftist ideas, but not limited to, put it into practice and then, perhaps, there would have been a 1994 così brutto. In un paese politicamente salubre, in caso di elezioni anticipate, saprei a chi dare il voto e non avrei paura di risvegliarmi con Bossi a capo del governo.
Si, il nano pelato è sul viale del tramonto e la sua nave sta imbarcando acqua, tant'è che anche i topi più fedeli hanno abbandonato lo scafo, ma non credo che lo vedremo in tribunale il 6 aprile perchè ci sarà sicuramente un legittimo qualcosa a salvare il suo "culo flaccido".
0 comments:
Post a Comment